A Review of
Sholeh Wolpé’s Translation of
Farīd ud-Dīn Attār’s The Conference of the Birds
Originally published in the
Rain Taxi Review of Books, Fall 2017
Farīd ud-Dīn Attār
Translated by
Sholeh Wolpé
W.W. Norton &
Company, $25.95
The Persian poet Farīd ud-Dīn Attār’s twelfth-century Sufi epic
The Conference of the Birds stands
alongside Dante’s Comedy and John
Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress as
one of the great creative works of spiritual self-discovery. Straddling a place
somewhere between Dante’s high fantasy and Bunyan’s naked allegory, The Conference of the Birds is also one
of the most ingeniously conceived and plotted narratives in all of world
literature, the denouement of its quest as astoundingly transformative as Oedipus the King, but without the
horrific eye-gouging. Exactly the opposite, in fact: Like Dante’s Comedy (which had the working title Vision), Attār’s poem leads from near blindness
to all-encompassing sight, its self-revelation a wholly moving and satisfying transfiguration.
The poem has only been translated into English a few times in the past half
century, with wildly differing results, and the Iranian-American poet Sholeh Wolpé’s
new translation now brings it for the first time into the third millennium.
It’s
impossible to discuss The Conference of
the Birds without spoiling its surprise ending, which is by far the poem’s main
feature and selling point. In brief, a conference of the world’s birds meets to
decide upon who should be their king, and their avian adviser the Hoopoe tells
them of the Simorgh, a legendary bird whose name means “thirty birds.” The
Simorgh was first spotted soaring over China, where a single one of its
feathers fell to earth and “triggered a titanic tumult in every land.” A single
drawing of the feather that was mounted in China’s national art gallery subsequently
became the wellspring of all wisdom, and also of all the world’s confusion:
Had the image
of that feather not been recorded,
all of the
world’s agitation would not have occurred.
All of science
and art is but the impression
of that single
feather.
A Negar Gari (miniature painting) of the Simorgh by contemporary artist Nadia Ostovar. |
Because nobody can comprehend even the drawing’s attributes—let alone the feather itself—the Hoopoe urges
the birds to seek the Simorgh themselves on the distant Mount Qaf, an emerald
crag that surround the world and is the place where the sun both rises and
sets. The birds all offer up excuses and objections, and after a lengthy
harangue from the Hoopoe instructing them on the Sufi path of self-abnegation,
the Wayfarers set out to traverse the seven valleys that purify them and ready
them to meet their Beloved. Each valley strips away an impeding aspect of their
ego, purging the birds of their worldly attachments and radically thinning out
the wayfaring flock at each step. Finally, of the initial group of 100,000 only
a remaining core of thirty purified birds reaches Mount Qaf to discover that
they, the thirty birds, are the
Simorgh.
Like King Oedipus,
they were the very one that they’d been seeking, but like Dorothy in Oz, they first
needed to make the journey toward the emerald horizon in order to discover this
fact. It’s not conceivable that Dante could have read this Persian poem, but its
similarities to his Comedy are
striking, and since much of the thinking of Europe’s high Middle Ages derived
from Arabic commentary upon Aristotle and other classics, perhaps the two poems
evolved from similar influences. The most startling similarity is how, like Attār’s
seven valleys, Dante’s Purgatory cleanses the pilgrim in seven distinct steps
of each of the seven deadly sins, leaving him immaculate and ready for
the stars. As a crowning pinnacle, and as an encircling frame, Mount Qaf also
fascinatingly prefigures both the peak of Mount Purgatory and the Paradiso’s heavenly Empyrean, which
exists outside of space and time and is at once the epicenter and the universe’s
encompassing outer limit.
From
Peter Sis’s 2011 illustrated version
|
Despite Attār’s brilliantly inspired concept for this poem, its composition and execution unfortunately fall far short of its Florentine counterpart. Attār shows remarkable resourcefulness in his parabolic approaches to the poem’s themes and concepts, and his tone and mindset are also much more sympathetic and welcoming than Dante’s harsh obsession with rules, but Attār lacks a dramatic and descriptive and organizational power that would continuously thrust the enthralled reader toward the poem’s astonishing end. The first two hundred pages (in Wolpé’s translation) are all preamble, with the Hoopoe first countering the birds’ complaints and objections and then answering their questions about the nature of their Beloved Simorgh. Then the seventy-or-so pages that address the seven purifying valleys of their journey are also all prospective preamble, describing what they’ll be like rather than actually describing their advent. Then the birds’ journey itself only fills a page and a half, followed by ten precious pages describing their transcendent transformation. These few dozen mind-bending lines make the entire poem, though. Attār then ends with a fascinating exploration of his own ego, vacillating between shocking artistic braggadocio and profoundly humble self-effacement, a meditation that revealingly illustrates the paradox of the ambitious sage who preaches humility. It’s like that old Onion article about the cocky yogi who declares, “I am the serenest!”
Compared to the two most readily
available English translations of The
Conference of the Birds, Wolpé’s
version alights somewhere between Dick Davis & Afkham Darbandi’s 1984
Penguin edition and Peter Avery’s more scholarly 1998 version. Davis &
Darbandi’s translation mimics Attār’s rhymed couplets with English rhymed couplets, to distractingly
sing-song effect, and it also unfortunately elides Attār’s self-examining/self-praising epilogue.
The more meticulous Avery includes the entire poem and thankfully eschews rhyme
while sticking to a strictly lined verse translation, and he also provides extraordinarily
helpful and thorough notes. Wolpé
varies her translation’s format between verse for the narrative and prose for
the Hoopoe’s parables, breaking each section up in a way that’s helpful for uninitiated
readers but not exactly faithful to the original. She also elides Attār’s opening invocation to Allah,
which Avery includes to gorgeous effect. In all, Wolpé has crafted a fine reading
experience with her new translation, breaking up some of the monotony of the
poem’s first three quarters with format shifts and chapter breaks and rubric
descriptions that keep the reader turning the pages. Her version of The Conference of the Birds may not be absolutely
true to the poem’s totality, but it serves as an exceptional initiation for
modern lay readers into the Path of the Wayfarer.
—David
Wiley
No comments:
Post a Comment